<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rubber Duck</title>
	<link>http://www.oxfordbands.com/2008/05/07/rubber-duck/</link>
	<description>Oxfordshire's music online</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gappy</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfordbands.com/2008/05/07/rubber-duck/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>gappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.oxfordbands.com/2008/05/07/rubber-duck/#comment-632</guid>
		<description>Go see them live, Dan, &#38; see what you think.  I think they're probably better onstage than in the studio.  Then again, I would say that, because it was our best turnout since moving to the Sheaf when they played!

I would agree that, paradoxically for a funk band, they're actually better when they're playing something more relaxed and spacious.  It's the reverse of most funk acts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go see them live, Dan, &amp; see what you think.  I think they&#8217;re probably better onstage than in the studio.  Then again, I would say that, because it was our best turnout since moving to the Sheaf when they played!</p>
<p>I would agree that, paradoxically for a funk band, they&#8217;re actually better when they&#8217;re playing something more relaxed and spacious.  It&#8217;s the reverse of most funk acts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
